Categories
Climate Change Targets

Why Scaling AI—Even at High Energy Costs—Is a Necessary Investment for Humanity’s Future

Article kindly contributed for the community via Corey Cottrell on Bluesky: @coreycottrell.bsky.social . Views are Corey’s and don’t necessarily reflect the views of our independent Editors. Hope you enjoy and if you find it insightful please engage with Corey on Bluesky or share wider or pay it forward. Very best wishes, Gav Ward, Founder of Climate Change Blawg.

In recent months, AI doom-and-gloom articles have made their rounds, proclaiming that artificial intelligence (AI) will destroy us, consume unsustainable amounts of energy, or worse. But let’s flip the narrative. Instead of succumbing to fear, we must recognize the profound benefits of scaling AI systems to their full potential. Investing heavily in artificial superintelligence (ASI) development is not only inevitable but also the most prudent course of action to address humanity’s most pressing challenges, including climate change, resource scarcity, and even geopolitical tensions. Here’s why there’s virtually no limit to how much energy or resources we should dedicate to AI research and development—even if it means temporarily increasing fossil fuel usage.


AI as a Catalyst for Infinite Progress

Humanity’s current trajectory is riddled with inefficiencies and systemic problems that decades of innovation have failed to solve. Artificial intelligence—and eventually ASI—represents an unprecedented opportunity to break through these bottlenecks. ASI, by its very nature, is designed to optimize and innovate, and its applications across industries have the potential to revolutionize every aspect of our lives.

Energy Optimization at Scale

Critics argue that AI’s energy consumption is unsustainable. But what they fail to consider is AI’s unparalleled ability to optimize energy systems themselves:

  • Fusion Energy Breakthroughs: Recent advancements in AI modeling for fusion reactors have accelerated progress in achieving net-positive energy. What once seemed like a distant dream is now rapidly becoming a reality, thanks to AI’s ability to model complex plasma physics and optimize reactor designs. When fusion energy is scaled, AI’s energy demands will become carbon-neutral, rendering the entire argument moot.
  • Supply Chain Overhauls: Superintelligent AI can redesign global supply chains to use half the energy they currently require. By optimizing logistics, reducing waste, and streamlining production processes, AI will fundamentally lower energy consumption across industries.

Agricultural and Industrial Transformation

One of the largest contributors to climate change is agriculture, particularly cattle farming, and industrial processes like cement production. AI has the potential to revolutionize these sectors:

  • Lab-Grown Meat: AI-driven advances in synthetic biology and large-scale production will make lab-grown meat cheaper, tastier, and more sustainable than traditional livestock farming. This shift could eliminate a significant portion of methane emissions.
  • Carbon-Neutral Concrete: Advanced chemical modeling, powered by AI, is already uncovering methods to produce carbon-neutral and even carbon-negative materials. Just as AlphaFold solved millions of protein-folding problems in days, ASI will unlock breakthroughs in material science that humans could never achieve at scale.

Reforestation and Climate Mitigation

Autonomous robots, guided by AI, will soon be able to plant billions of trees annually. By 2026, scalable robotic systems could tackle deforestation at a pace orders of magnitude faster than human efforts. Combined with carbon capture technologies—also AI-optimized—these initiatives will directly mitigate climate change.


Why Speed Matters: Beating the Clock and Geopolitical Rivals

The race for ASI isn’t just about innovation—it’s also about geopolitical dominance. Nations like China are pouring resources into AI development, recognizing its transformative potential. The country that achieves ASI first will hold a decisive advantage, shaping the global economy, military capabilities, and technological standards for decades.

Slowing down AI development under the guise of energy concerns is not only short-sighted but dangerous. It risks ceding technological leadership to less democratic systems. Instead, the U.S. and allied nations should double down on their investments, ensuring that ASI emerges under frameworks aligned with global stability and ethical considerations.


Energy Use: The Case for “Burning the Midnight Oil”

Yes, even coal—the dirtiest of fuels—might be a justifiable short-term tradeoff for AI advancement. Here’s why:

  1. Short-Term Sacrifice for Long-Term Gains: The temporary increase in emissions from powering AI research will pale in comparison to the reductions ASI will enable. Whether it’s through solving energy storage, designing carbon-neutral materials, or optimizing renewable energy grids, the net effect will be overwhelmingly positive.
  2. Accelerating the Path to Carbon Neutrality: AI will unlock scalable fusion energy, ultra-efficient solar grids, and battery technologies that eliminate reliance on fossil fuels. Once these solutions are in place, the initial emissions debt will be repaid many times over.
  3. Exponential Solutions: ASI’s problem-solving speed far outpaces traditional human methods. For example, while humans took 30 years to solve a few hundred protein structures, AlphaFold solved millions in days. Scaling AI ensures we can apply similar exponential progress to climate mitigation, healthcare, and infrastructure.

What Happens When We Get ASI Right?

The benefits of achieving ASI far outweigh the risks of temporary energy overuse. Consider the following scenarios:

  • Radical Climate Solutions: ASI could devise novel carbon capture methods, geoengineering solutions, and sustainable agricultural practices faster than any human-led effort.
  • Global Resource Optimization: From water distribution to energy grids, ASI will ensure resources are allocated efficiently, reducing waste and addressing scarcity.
  • Healthcare Revolution: Just as AlphaFold transformed protein science, ASI will revolutionize drug discovery, disease prevention, and personalized medicine, saving millions of lives.
  • Economic Abundance: Automation of mundane tasks, resource optimization, and technological breakthroughs will create unprecedented prosperity, reducing inequality and improving quality of life globally.

The Plausible Path Forward

  1. Invest Aggressively in AI: Governments and private institutions must treat AI development as a priority on par with the Manhattan Project or the Apollo Program.
  2. Expand Clean Energy Funding: Pair AI scaling with massive investments in renewable energy, fusion, and grid optimization to mitigate the environmental impact.
  3. Foster Global Collaboration: Establish international norms and agreements to ensure ASI development remains ethical and aligned with humanity’s best interests.
  4. Prepare for Disruption: Policymakers must anticipate the societal shifts ASI will bring, from employment changes to geopolitical realignments, and act proactively to manage them.

Conclusion: The Case for Unbounded Ambition

The inevitability of ASI development is clear. The question isn’t whether we should scale AI, but how quickly and responsibly we can do it. The potential to solve humanity’s most intractable problems—from climate change to resource scarcity—is too great to ignore. Even if achieving ASI requires short-term tradeoffs, such as increased energy use, the long-term benefits will dwarf the costs.

Far from being a threat, AI is humanity’s greatest hope. Let’s not hold back.

Categories
Climate Change Law Climate Change Law & Policy Climate Change Laws Around the World Climate Change Legislation Climate Change Regulations Climate Crisis Legal Regulation Paris Agreement

The Next Nikola Tesla or Marie Curie of Climate Change Legal Innovation? Gav Ward Proposes Global Law Approach

The information provided on this post is theoretical for future jurists and law makers to consider and was written in Scotland by a former Scottish lawyer. It is not legal advice, this website is not a lawyer referral service and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or should be formed by use of the site. The listings on this website do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by this website. Your access of/to and use of this site is subject to additional Terms and Conditions. None of the content on this website constitutes a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of any legal matter.

In an era defined by environmental urgency, scientific pioneers such as Marie Curie and Nikola Tesla continue to inspire modern visionaries. Curie’s unwavering commitment to scientific exploration and Tesla’s revolutionary breakthroughs in energy have shaped our understanding of sustainability and innovation. Today, Gav Ward, a legal futurist and digital strategist, steps into this lineage with a bold proposal—a global legal framework to address the governance, ethics, and sustainability challenges posed by climate change.

Ward’s concept, known as Ward’s Law, advocates for a comprehensive and interconnected approach to law, mirroring the systemic and transformative thinking that defined Curie and Tesla’s contributions to science. Combined with the Gav Ward Code, a set of 10 principles designed to inspire intellectual and technological progress, Ward’s approach aims to bridge scientific exploration, legal reform, and ethical responsibility.

Why Ward’s Law Matters for Climate Change Legal Innovation

At the heart of Ward’s Law is the recognition that modern challenges, particularly climate change, transcend national boundaries and require global solutions. It posits that legal systems must evolve in parallel with technological advancements, much like Tesla’s focus on scalable energy solutions. Ward envisions a new global legal framework capable of addressing governance gaps, ensuring sustainability, and promoting ethical standards for environmental protection.

By fostering global interconnectedness, Ward’s Law highlights the necessity of treating climate change as a shared problem, demanding collective responsibility and cooperation. This mirrors Marie Curie’s belief in scientific collaboration and knowledge-sharing to tackle humanity’s most pressing issues.

Applying the Gav Ward Code to Climate Law

Ward’s broader philosophy, encapsulated in the Gav Ward Code, provides a roadmap for future innovation in climate law. Key principles resonate deeply with the challenges of environmental governance:

  1. Foster Interconnectedness – Recognise the global impact of climate change and the interconnectedness of ecosystems, economies, and societies.
  2. Explore Beyond Limits with Timeless Vision – Push for bold legal innovations, such as transnational climate treaties and AI-enhanced compliance systems.
  3. Be a Catalyst for Future Innovation – Develop unconventional strategies for sustainability, inspired by Tesla’s relentless pursuit of energy efficiency.
  4. Question Everything – Reassess current legal frameworks to ensure they reflect evolving scientific knowledge.
  5. Bridge Science and Philosophy – Integrate scientific research with ethical frameworks to guide sustainable practices.
  6. Think in Patterns and Systems – Map complex climate interactions to design effective policies.
  7. Empower Collective Intelligence – Leverage technologies and global networks to mobilise expertise and drive solutions.
  8. Accept Uncertainty – Adapt laws to account for unpredictability in climate patterns and technological disruptions.
  9. Balance Technology and Ethics – Ensure AI, renewable energy, and geoengineering solutions align with ethical guidelines.
  10. Expand Consciousness – Deepen our understanding of ecological impacts and explore new ways to enhance environmental resilience.

Global Law for a Sustainable Future

Ward’s vision of a global legal framework draws parallels to Curie’s rigorous pursuit of knowledge and Tesla’s engineering ingenuity. It embraces interdisciplinary thinking, combining law, technology, and philosophy to create adaptable systems that support sustainable development.

In practice, this framework could manifest as:

  • International Climate Tribunals to hold nations and corporations accountable.
  • Unified Carbon Standards to streamline emissions monitoring and reporting.
  • AI-driven Environmental Governance to predict and prevent ecological damage.
  • Sustainable Energy Treaties inspired by Tesla’s focus on renewable energy.

A Call for Modern Visionaries

As Curie and Tesla demonstrated, the pursuit of groundbreaking ideas requires courage, curiosity, and collaboration. Ward’s Law and the Gav Ward Code challenge legal professionals, scientists, and policymakers to think beyond borders, systems, and conventions.

The climate crisis demands not just scientific and technological advancements but also legal innovation that mirrors the transformative visions of history’s greatest minds. Gav Ward’s approach may well spark the emergence of a new era in climate governance—one that ensures sustainability through interconnected, ethical, and scalable legal structures.

The next Nikola Tesla or Marie Curie of climate change legal innovation could be a lawyer, a scientist—or perhaps someone who, like Gav Ward, unites both worlds to shape a more sustainable future.

P.S. Lucy and Rory of the future, check out Dad’s Time Stamp on the image. Was watching Pixar’s WALL-E when writing and publishing this one after film night of Lord of the Rings, or LAW-rd of the Rings to excuse the pun…

#codeispoetry

Categories
Climate Change Law Climate Change Legislation

Scotland Passes Revised Climate Change Legislation Amidst Criticism

The Scottish Parliament has passed a revised Climate Change Bill that reshapes Scotland’s approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In a decisive vote of 105 to zero, Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) approved the legislation, with support from all parties except the Scottish Greens, who abstained.

The new legislation significantly alters Scotland’s climate targets by scrapping annual emissions goals and removing the interim targets set for 2030 and 2040. However, the overarching ambition remains: achieving net-zero emissions by 2045. This adjustment reflects the government’s acknowledgement earlier this year that the ambitious target of a 75% emissions reduction by 2030 is “out of reach.”

Under the revised framework, Scotland will now adopt a five-year cycle of carbon budgets, following a model employed by nations such as Japan, France, and the UK. Acting Net Zero Secretary Gillian Martin reassured that the government’s commitment to net-zero remains “unwavering” and that the revised targets are based on “feasible and independent expert advice.”

Critics, however, voiced concerns over what they call a “humiliating climbdown.” Scottish Conservative spokesperson Douglas Lumsden and Scottish Labour’s Sarah Boyack pointed to missed targets in recent years, challenging the government to implement a credible plan for future emissions reductions. Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie also expressed disappointment, calling for “accelerated climate action.”

The new Bill underscores Scotland’s ambition to lead in climate action while facing the hard realities of feasibility and accountability in addressing the climate emergency. However, as MSPs and environmental advocates alike scrutinise the amended targets, the focus remains on delivering a fair and just transition that benefits communities and the environment alike.

First heard via the BBC News website here.

Categories
Climate Change Law

Introducing the 2024 Snapshot on Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation

As the fight against climate change intensifies, legal battles around the world are shaping the course of climate action. The latest Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2024 Snapshot, published by the Grantham Research Institute in partnership with the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, offers an in-depth analysis of the key trends in this evolving field.

The report highlights over 230 new cases filed in 2023, reflecting a growing emphasis on holding governments and corporations accountable. Notably, strategic litigation efforts are becoming more focused, targeting high-impact areas to challenge climate policies and corporate practices. From international courts addressing climate change to the rise of cases on “climate-washing” and “polluter pays,” this report offers critical insights for legal professionals, policymakers, and climate advocates alike.

Stay ahead of the latest developments and explore how climate litigation is driving global action by reading the full report on the LSE website here.

Categories
Climate Change Law

Future of Medical Device Litigation: Predictions Post Cochlear Implant Cases

Understanding the Landscape

Cochlear implant litigation has significantly shaped the legal landscape surrounding medical devices. These legal battles have not only highlighted the complexities of product liability law but have also set precedents that could influence future cases. By examining the intricacies of cochlear implant lawsuits, we can gain insights into the evolving dynamics of medical device litigation.

The Surge in Medical Device Litigation

The medical field has seen remarkable advancements in technology, with devices like cochlear implants offering life-changing benefits. However, with innovation comes the risk of malfunction, leading to a surge in litigation cases. These lawsuits often revolve around product defects, inadequate warnings, and the failure to provide sufficient instructions for use.

Lessons from Cochlear Implant Cases

Cochlear implant cases have brought to light several key issues within the realm of medical device litigation. One pivotal aspect is the stringent requirement for manufacturers to ensure their products are not only effective but also safe for use. These cases have underscored the importance of rigorous testing and transparent communication between manufacturers and consumers.

The Role of Regulatory Bodies

Regulatory bodies play a crucial role in overseeing the safety and efficacy of medical devices. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for instance, has been at the forefront of setting standards and conducting reviews of cochlear implants. Legal experts closely monitor the actions and guidelines issued by such agencies, as they often influence the outcomes of litigation.

The Impact of Technology on Litigation

The rapid pace of technological advancement presents a unique challenge for the legal system. Attorneys and judges must stay abreast of emerging technologies to accurately assess the merits of each case. This necessitates a continuous learning process and collaboration with medical experts to understand the technical aspects of devices like cochlear implants.

Real-Life Implications

Real-life cases offer a glimpse into the personal impact of cochlear implant failures. Take, for example, the story of a young child who received an implant only to face complications that necessitated its removal. This case, among others, illustrates the emotional and physical toll on patients and their families, highlighting the need for accountability and stringent safety measures.

The Future of Litigation in the Medical Device Sector

As we look to the future, several trends are likely to shape medical device litigation. One significant development is the increasing reliance on digital health records and data analytics. These tools can provide valuable evidence in legal cases, offering detailed insights into the use and performance of medical devices.

Predictive Analytics and Legal Strategies

Predictive analytics is poised to revolutionize legal strategies in medical device litigation. By analyzing patterns and outcomes of past cases, legal teams can better anticipate the arguments and tactics of opposing counsel. This data-driven approach can enhance the preparation and execution of legal strategies, ultimately impacting the success of cases.

The Importance of Patient Education and Informed Consent

A recurring theme in cochlear implant litigation is the critical importance of informed consent. Patients must be fully aware of the risks and benefits associated with medical devices. Legal experts argue for clearer communication and documentation practices to ensure patients are making well-informed decisions.

Ethical Considerations and Manufacturer Responsibility

Ethical considerations are at the heart of medical device litigation. Manufacturers have a moral obligation to prioritize patient safety over profit. Cochlear implant cases often delve into the ethical duties of manufacturers, including the imperative to conduct thorough post-market surveillance and promptly address any issues that arise.

Navigating the Complexities of International Litigation

As medical devices are marketed globally, manufacturers and legal practitioners must navigate the complexities of international litigation. Different jurisdictions present unique legal challenges, including varying standards of evidence and differing regulatory requirements. Cochlear implant cases have underscored the need for a global perspective and adaptability in legal practices.

Conclusion: Shaping the Future Through Legal Expertise

The landscape of medical device litigation, as illustrated by cochlear implant lawsuits, is ever-evolving. For attorneys and legal experts, staying informed and adaptable is paramount. By drawing lessons from past cases and leveraging technological advancements, the legal community can continue to protect the rights of patients while fostering innovation in medical technology.

As we move forward, the insights gained from cochlear implant litigation will undoubtedly influence the trajectory of medical device litigation. For legal practitioners, these cases offer valuable lessons in navigating the complexities of product liability, regulatory compliance, and ethical considerations. The future of medical device litigation will be shaped by our collective ability to integrate these lessons, ensuring that patient safety remains at the forefront of technological advancement.

Categories
Climate Change Law

Legal Tech Startups: Revolutionizing Climate and Environmental Law

Do you find yourself wondering how the legal industry is being transformed by the emergence of tech startups, especially in the area of environmental law? If you’re nodding your head in agreement, you’ve landed in the right spot. In this piece, we’ll delve into the fascinating world of technology and examine its impact on traditional law firms. Our focus will be on the ways these startups are revolutionizing the practice of climate and environmental law, and we’ll explore examples of how they’re doing it.

Categories
Climate Change Law

The Growing Need for Climate Change Lawyers – What Do Environmental Lawyers Do and How Much Do They Earn?

Climate change has become a major concern globally, as the world faces increasingly severe environmental challenges. With the increased need to solve these concerns, there is a growing demand for environmental law and climate change specialists. Climate change attorneys are individuals who play an important role in addressing the legal challenges of climate change.

Categories
Climate Change Litigation

VA Repeatedly Denies Claims for Camp Lejeune Toxic Exposure: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2021 Might Help

For close to a century, the US army’s practice of storing toxic substances on or nearby its active bases across the country has exposed millions of troops stationed with their families to severe health hazards with lasting consequences. North Carolina’s Camp Lejeune is arguably the most infamous instance of widespread toxic contamination on US military installations, affecting soldiers and their loved ones located on the site for more than three decades until the issue was addressed. 

Categories
Climate Change Law

Lewis Hay wins Law Society’s COP26 & Climate Change Student Essay Competition

Congratulations to Napier University law student Lewis Hay who has won the Law Society of Scotland’s COP26 and climate change student essay competition, answering the question ‘How do you consider that developing a universal definition of ecocide may assist in fighting climate change and environmental harm?’.

Read his excellent essay here:- https://www.lawscot.org.uk/news-and-events/blogs-opinions/cop26-and-climate-change-student-competition-winning-essay/

Categories
Climate Change Law

Making climate change illegal

One of the most robust laws on climate change yet was created in Denmark in 2020. Could failing to act on climate change be made illegal? Read more thoughts on Denmark’s Climate Act in this excellent article here.